signal avg 90 (outdoors, line of sight to cell tower, same altitude)
signal avg 8O (indoors, line of sight to cell tower, same altitude)
signal avg 60 (indoors, no line of sight to cell tower, same altitude)
signal avg 4O (outdoors, no line of sight to cell tower, ground level)
With device cradled in hand a average decrease of signal by about 20 in all cases and whatever finger configuration.
Turning 3G on causes a average decrease of signal by 5 in all cases.
The connection strength bars shows 5 bars in all cases.
Absolute minimum experienced : 19, absolute maximum 96.
The thing to take away from all this is that if you already had a very bad connection under 20 and subtract the hand attenuation of about 20 you are left with no signal, and it did not hep that until iOS 4.0.1 a bad connection with a 20 strength would have shown 4 or even 5 bars.
The application used to test gets the signal strength from private calls to apple’s CoreTelephony framework, in a effort to help the iphone signal testing going on share a common base i am providing the application to anyone, please let me know what are the results of your tests and feel free to contribute to the code on github.
The application is named VAFieldTest , it’s code is under a open source license and can be found at http://github.com/valexa/VAFieldTest , you need Xcode and a iPhone developer account to compile and run it.
iOS 4.0.1 update same behavior as before, with the difference that now the connection bars properly reflect changes in the strength (I 1-19, II 20-29, III 30-39, IIII 40-49, IIIII 50-99 ) , with previous versions they just show 5 bars for any signal strengths above 25.
Here is a little handy tip to make your device speak textual content with almost acceptable computer voice:
Go to Settings > General > Accessibility > Triple-click home to “Toggle VoiceOver” or “Ask” if you want to get a dialog asking wether to turn it On/Off (remember that tapping is done by double-tapping when voiceover is on).
Optionally go into Settings > General > Accessibility > Voiceover and set the “Speaking Rate” slider to around 20%, i found that speed to work best for me when reading papers.
Now go to your book or webpage or anything you want read and triple-click home and behold the machine start speaking your currently selected element,
Remember to turn voiceover off when you are done or else you will have to interact with the phone interface in a a whole different way (if by any chance you lock the device as i did you can unlock it by tapping the swipe bar to select it then tapping it again to unlock).
The major pitfalls besides the surprisingly hard to perform triple-tap home is that you have to select any text blocks you want read, and while this might be acceptable for pdf books where you can select a whole page in basically everything else you have to select individual paragraphs, even sentences, so do not expect a audiobook experience, and do not expect it to speak the contents of apps that do not have selectable text like WSJ, NYT etc (BBC/Reuters/AP work).
It is a shame Apple did not make it possible for this to be implemented as a book/content speaker with a consistent behavior and without relying on voiceover tricks, as it will even support reading in a lot of other languages than English, (for the full list see this for iPad and this for the other devices)
Voiceover is only available on iPhone 3GS, 4, iPad and 3rd generation iPod touch.
There seems to be a significant issue with the iAd implementation at the moment, the ads themselves are not cached on the operating system, and that has two major implications:
1 – ads can be disabled by the user by just turning off the network connection
2 – the user has incentive to disable ads under pricy data plans as every load adds to their data quota
To a developer this gives a strong incentive to both give the user the ability to purchase a removal of ads and make sure the user does not turn adds off otherwise (i am even starting to see places advising users to do so) i will go on showing how to do both and all the code is given as a xcode project attached.
Wether you have a free application and your business model depends solely on iAd’s or you monetize in other ways, if you implemented iAd you have to acknowledge the next thing:
People will want to remove the ads if at all possible, if you implemented iAd you should also allow the user to make an in app purchase for removing the ads, i will also show you how to do that in the code attached as a xcode project.
Do not get me wrong, i believe that some of the users will make the right choice and pay compensation in return of removing the ads if you give them that option, but a lot of the people will make the choice of depriving you of your ad income if they can make them stop loading.
So i will also show you how to implement a way to check if a ad was loaded after a amount of time and effectively disable the application otherwise, you can find the code in the xcode project attached.
I want to end with saying that this is clearly not a ideal situation and i hope that Apple will move quickly to address both issues 1 and 2 from within the operating system which would make a lot of sense and is a case of how they should have leveraged the fact that they built it within the operating system in the first place.
Now i will give you some details about the code, it supports all interface orientations, all devices, it requires 2 frameworks (iAd and StoreKit with iAd being weak linked) , the bulk of the code is in iAdAppViewController, this is the only one you need to edit to suit your interface and change com.foo.bar.removeads to your ProductID, besides that there is a PaymentObserver class that handles the in-app purchasing.
AdAppViewController must implement the PaymentObserverDelegate and ADBannerViewDelegate protocols, it subclasses viewDidLoad to do the initializations, viewDidAppear to position the elements, adLoadCheck to check if the ad was loaded, adsButtonPressed for when the user buys, removedAdsPurchased for when the purchase is confirmed, bannerViewDidLoadAd fires when an ad loads and willAnimateRotationToInterfaceOrientation when the device orientation is changed, resizeBanner is the code called to position/reposition the ad and the other elements in your interface.
ADBannerView *adBanner is the banner itself, UIButton *adButton is the button above the ad to purchase ad removal, UIView *adBlockView is the view presented over the interface as shown in the image to the right.
I will not go into more detail than this other than to say it was all tested and should work as expected, but i did not implement this myself and i give no absolute guarantees , if you have any specific question leave it as a comment.
We all like the new feature in Safari 5, Reader, well maybe except the advertisers, it is so pristine as anything we would expect from Apple but as it turns out it is actually based on the work of NYC based design house arc90, namely Readability which is acknowledged by Apple in file:///Applications/Safari.app/Contents/Resources/Acknowledgments.html
If you visit their Readability page you will notice that it is implemented as a javascript bookmarklet useable in any browser (i tested Chrome and Firefox) , all you have to do is drag the link to the bookmarks bar, for Mobile Safari which does not have such a bar it is a bit more complicated:
1 – create a placeholder bookmark by pressing plus (can be any page), press Save
2 – copy the javascript at the bottom of this post into the pasteboard
3 – press bookmarks > press edit > press the arrow on the shortcut you created
4 – press the round x to clear the name and type say Readability
5 – select the bottom field, press the round x to clear the address and paste the text
Now when you want to see only the content on a page you are visiting just tap the newly created bookmark and you are all set.
Just in case you want to enhance your Mobile Safari even more you might want to check out http://ipuhelin.com/en/safariplus/ ,in page text search is a must-have if you ask me.
Exactly 2 years ago Seesmic purchased Twhirl and shifted from a video conversation platform to a twitter client, i will continue to make a brief overview of the process as it provides a extremely interesting and relevant case.
I started following Seesmic when it was still a video site, behind it is Loic Lemeur a well known entrepreneur highly involved in social media and the father of the LeWeb conference, when he started Seesmic he even moved to San Francisco getting people like Pierre Omidyar, Reid Hoffman, Stephen Case on board and two series of founding $6M each.
By this time there still was no business model but Loic’s goal was to have a impact and create value and like every investor knows, that eventually blooms into a business, by the end of 2008 however there were already signs of trouble with 1/3 of staff being laid off, early into 2009 a web version of Seesmic’s twitter client was released then silence until early 1010 when Loic used Microsoft’s Professional Developers Conference as a platform to launch Seesmic for Blackberry and Android, which signaled the shift toward Windows, Loic himself switching to Windows after complaining about issues upgrading OSX to Snow Leopard.
The mobile and web versions joined the initial desktop Seesmic twitter client that ran on both Windows and OSX courtesy of Twirl’s Adobe Air codebase, so by now you could say that they had everything covered, except one minor thing, the iPhone, and in two days from now the iPad, which brings me to the reason why i started writing this.
Sure, you could argue that they identified the niche in the lucrative and less competitive Blackberry/Windows space, apparently they quickly hired a bunch of romanian windows developers and eventually even partnered with Microsoft to create a windows only flavor of Seesmic for the masses, Seesmic Look, so they could afford to ignore iPhone and the iPad markets, saturated with independent developers and highly competitive, even if Loic had the founds and the levers to give it a edge over anyone else.
Either way Seesmic makes for a extremely interesting case study, i gave up waiting for a native OSX/iPhone client, but things are not looking good for the days ahead, here is how it will look: people opening seesmic.com from a iPhone and more importantly from the iPad will be thrown into a dead-end with broken image links and suggestions to get the Android and Blackberry clients, even if they know the url to the web based Sesmic client they will be unable to access it from mobile browsers, and there is no native Sesmic in the AppStore either, which brings the options to 0.
Seesmic’s web based client does not work on mobile browsers.
The media is awash with reviews about the iPad being underwhelming, limited and so forth but mostly missing the point save for a few notable exceptions (1, 2, 3).
I am going to state in no equivocal manner that the iPad is the biggest thing since the PC was introduced by IBM in 1981 and for a long while it is going to be in a class of it’s own that could be easily called the “Truly” Personal Computer.
It is going to be the first choice as a first computer for people not having one, and the first choice as the first portable/tablet device for people not having one.
It is going to sell huge numbers slowly but steadily and by 2015 there are probably going to be 100-200 million units sold compared to 1-2 billion computers worldwide.
Why ? 5 reasons :
1 – no operating system learning curve The majority of computer users do not want to learn how to use a operating system and only use one for a limited number of tasks identified by apple as : access the internet/email, read books/periodicals, watch/listen to audio-visual media, play games, manage contacts/calendar/spreadsheets etc.
For everything else there will be a app, you know “there’s an app for that”, as for the techies/geeks will probably sport jailbroken iPad’s or run OSX on it.
The majority of computer users are not really familiar with how a operating system works, and they should not be, once they figure out that they can do pretty much everything they need on the iPad the time they use a PC will dramatically decrease.
2 – touch: Have you ever watched a person learning to handle a mouse trying to click a icon and instead dragging it, struggling with frustration to grasp the user interface elements in a operating system ?
Have you ever seen someone that never used a touch device like a iphone before or a 5 year old just take it and immediately figure out by intuition alone how it works and how to handle it ?
Touch is infinitely more natural than cursor/pointer based interaction with user interface elements and the mouse will slowly grow limited to the those of us that really need the precision the same way that trackball and graphic tablet users are limited to those that need it’s added functionality when interacting with a computer.
3 – portability : The “personal” in PC used to mean you owned it, it was yours, but nothing is more personal than something you can carry on person, have it always with you, nothing more personal than an device you control by touch alone.
The technology is mature enough at this point that devices are really starting to be portable , at this point the size of the device for now is almost solely dictated only by the size we want it’s display to be.
The iPad is exactly the right size between a phone and a laptop to be wearable in our bags and purses without being a bother.
10 hours of battery is finally starting to get close to handling a full day of usage unprecedented in portable computers.
4 - multipurpose platform : Every single engineering/musical/medical etc. multitouch device can be replaced by a single iPad having multiple specific software, people have been dreaming this for ages, the days of proprietary devices that married one specific piece of software with a specific piece of hardware are numbered.
5 – affordability : Apple has really made apparent their intention of having the iPad priced as low as possible and as they sell more and more of them and the technology evolves and cheapens they are going to significantly lower the price at which they sell the iPad without a significant loss of the margins.
That being said the iPad is great, the only issue with it is the paradox that makes the level of simplification in the iPad only possible in conjunction with paramount control over they way it behaves, if i could ask Apple for one thing it would be a single switch that takes away a bit of simplicity in exchange for a bit of flexibility, there are certainly a number of us out there that would pull it.
Peering into the settings for the magic mouse i have found out what looks like support for 3 finger tap gestures for Dashboard and/or Expose control , namely :
“Dashboard” – three fingers tap
“Exposé All Windows” - three fingers tap to expose all window
“Exposé Application Windows” - three fingers tap to expose app window
“Exposé Desktop” - three fingers tap to expose desktop
These look like the options you would see in a dropdown list from which to select one action associated with a 3finger tap.
Currently you do not have a mouse system preferences option for 3finger , only “One Finger” and “Two Finger” sections are available for now.
Another thing to note is that a 1 finger swipe action is also referenced , and that “Mighty Mouse” still remains as as string reference , if you search for that in system prefs the mouse icon will be highlighted , this could show that apple was really in a hurry on this , sloppy or understaffed , either way here is the system preferences movie for the magic mouse:
Who knows if 3 finger tap functionality was planned but not finished or removed , but it was not entirely built and disabled either , because it can not be enabled as it is.
EDIT : I released a free app to enable adding middle click , expose , dashboard , desktop , spaces , both button holding , etc , the works in my app MagicPrefs
