<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Vlad Alexa&#039;s Blog &#187; dns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.vladalexa.com/tag/dns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.vladalexa.com</link>
	<description>software , networks , apple , open source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:36:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DNS spam defined</title>
		<link>http://blog.vladalexa.com/2006/11/22/dns-spam-defined/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dns-spam-defined</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vladalexa.com/2006/11/22/dns-spam-defined/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vladalexa.com/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you ever did a whois on say google.com , miscrosoft.com or yahoo.com you have been most likely been exposed to some obscenity and there is nothing the owners of the named domains can do about it. This is to say that they or their providers or the dns servers have not been in any way hacked or &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vladalexa.com/2006/11/22/dns-spam-defined/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To park or not to park</title>
		<link>http://blog.vladalexa.com/2006/07/13/to-park-or-not-to-park/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=to-park-or-not-to-park</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vladalexa.com/2006/07/13/to-park-or-not-to-park/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 03:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoDaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vladalexa.com/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What would you say if not owning a garage your auto seller would supply by default a Mord truck by your house for you to park your new car into and told you this is your only alternative besides buying a garage from them? Well such a situation is functional concerning Internet domains and this &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vladalexa.com/2006/07/13/to-park-or-not-to-park/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Introducing SPF namely Sender Policy Framework</title>
		<link>http://blog.vladalexa.com/2005/01/02/introducing-spf-namely-sender-policy-framework/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=introducing-spf-namely-sender-policy-framework</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vladalexa.com/2005/01/02/introducing-spf-namely-sender-policy-framework/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2005 02:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vlad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whois]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vladalexa.com/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since aprox Sept 2004 there is a new headache for mail server administrators but it is not sure whatever it has the same effect on spammers , like it was intended to , and it&#8217;s name is SPF . It is part of a set of rules that work for the purpose of stopping spam , &#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vladalexa.com/2005/01/02/introducing-spf-namely-sender-policy-framework/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

